you're reading...
Association of Discipline Defense Counsel, David Cameron Carr, Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack, Howard Miller, Howard Rice, Jerome Falk, Ninth Circuit, Paul Triana, State Bar Court, Uncategorized

David Cameron Carr: “It is Good to Be King”

Mr. David Cameron Carr — an expert in the area of legal ethics and the
current President of the California-based Association of Discipline
Defense Counsel — has publicly criticized the State Bar of California, Howard Rice’s Jerome Falk, as well as Thomas Girardi and Howard Miller,
over the handling of disciplinary proceedings concerning misconduct by
Thomas Girardi and Walter Lack in the litigation against Dole Food
Company.

David Cameron Carr
Mr David Cameron Carr, believes that “all lawyers must understand the
rules of legal ethics, not only to fulfill their responsibilities to
society and to the justice system, but to protect themselves.”
(Photo credit: www.123people.com )

In a shocking move, Mr. Carr -– a former California State Bar prosecutor
–- offered a stinging rebuke to Jerome Falk’s decision not to pursue any
discipline against Girardi and Lack despite the clear findings of
misconduct on their part by the Ninth Circuit.

Previously, in a rare action, the Ninth Circuit suspended Walter Lack
and Paul Triana of Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack for 6 months, and
reprimanded Thomas Girardi of Girardi & Keese, while imposing close
to $400,000 in monetary sanctions. Specifically, the Ninth Circuit found that the misconduct by Walter Lack
and Thomas Girardi involved “the persistent use of known falsehoods,”
and that the “false representations” were made “knowingly,
intentionally, and recklessly.”
Carr, writing on his blog http://www.ethics-lawyer.com/kafkaesq/ in an
entry labeled “It is Good to Be King,” wrote as follows on January 21,
2011:

“It’s hard to escape the troubling thought that, had Mr. Girardi
and Mr. Lack been different lawyers with no connection to the State Bar
like Howard Miller, the process and perhaps even the result would have
been much different.”

Mr. Carr offered legal analysis, referring to “Bus. & Prof. Code
section 6068(d) (codifying lawyer’s duty not ‘to seek to mislead the
judge or any judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact
or law.’). As a matter of law, this, most assuredly, would warrant the
imposition of discipline in California.” Mr. Carr continued, noting
that “the lack of intent to mislead the court doesn’t seem to matter for
culpability purposes in State Bar Court.”

In his conclusion, Carr stated: “As a discipline defender, I am not inclined to second guess a
decision not to prosecute a discipline case. And I don’t know all the
facts that went into Mr. Falk’s exercise of discretion; he isn’t talking
and neither is the State Bar. But I do know, now as ever, it is good to
be king. Or at least very close to one. Very very good.”

According to confidental sources , Mr. Carr should be commended for his
courage in speaking up, as well as his intellectual honesty and
integrity – the defining traits of a good lawyer. One confidential source believe, however, that some of Mr. Carr’s
comments regarding “intent” are superfluous as Walter Lack had
stipulated that his misconduct was “intentional.” See http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202434690835

About these ads

About Leslie Brodie

Leslie Brodie is a reporter, writer, blogger, activist, and a religious leader in the community.

Discussion

Comments are closed.

Categories

RSS .

  • Does the rules committee follow the rules? 2014/07/23
      Last Thursday, the Judicial Council’s Rules and Projects Committee (RUPRO) met to take up the issue of the renaming of the Administrative Office of the Courts, as requested by the Chief Justice.  The RUPRO meeting, conducted telephonically, was slated to run an hour.  It lasted only 15 minutes. As expected, the committee voted unanimously […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Will the real judicial council board of directors please stand up? 2014/07/16
    “This retirement at once changes everything, and changes nothing.” Administrative Director of the AOC Steven Jahr   Doublespeak. We’re accustomed to hearing it from national leadership but from the ostensible leadership of a whole branch of state government, especially the judicial branch is …. uncommon. What bothers us the most about this statement is that […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • “AOC” Name to be Eliminated; Judicial Council Accepts Direct Responsibility for Audit Outcome 2014/07/01
    From the Alliance of California Judges….   In a bizarre move, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye opened Friday’s meeting of the Judicial Council by announcing her intention to “retire, remove, take away, eliminate the name ‘Administrative Office of the Courts.’” Friday’s published meeting agenda contained no reference whatsoever to the planned action. The Chi […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • The Judicial Council’s Extreme Makeover 2014/06/28
    For those of you who work for or have ever worked for the AOC as well as many of you in the courts, a move made this week to change the name of the administrative office of the courts is laughable and serves only to feverishly repaint the titanic just before it dips below the […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • When the court falsifies the record it undermines the integrity of the judicial system 2014/06/20
    Nobody is above the law. Well, except sometimes, when you’re a California judge. We generally make it a point to shy away legal cases and focus on what is wrong with the judicial branch. Mostly what is wrong with the judicial branch can be found in San Francisco. However……sometimes we see a series of incidents […]
    Judicial Council Watcher

RSS Drudge Report Feed

.
%d bloggers like this: