you're reading...
Leslie Brodie, The Leslie Brodie Report, Uncategorized

Supreme Court Justices Mull Issue of Qualified Immunity for Private Attorneys Conducting Investigations for Public Clients

http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.martindale.com%2Fsupreme-court-justices-mull-issue-of-qualified-immunity-for-private-attorneys-conducting-investigations-for-public-clients&layout=standard&show_faces=true&width=300&height=25&action=like&font=arial&colorscheme=light

http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/hub.1326407570.html

The U. S. Supreme Court recently heard arguments in the case Filarsky v. Delia (appealed from 9th Cir. 9/9/10) involving a private employment attorney, Steve Filarsky, retained by the City of Rialto to conduct an internal affairs investigation. Filarsky caused the City to order respondent firefighter Delia to consent to a warrantless search of his home. Delia subsequently brought a civil rights claim against both the City and Filarsky alleging, among other things, a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court granted Filarsky’s and the City’s motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part, ruling that Filarsky, a private attorney, could not enjoy such immunity. Other circuit courts have granted qualified immunity to private lawyers retained by the government, and the Supreme Court must now resolve the circuit courts’ split.

About these ads

About Leslie Brodie

Leslie Brodie is a reporter, writer, blogger, activist, and a religious leader in the community.

Discussion

Comments are closed.

Categories

RSS .

  • Powerful Judicial Council Committee opens the public meeting doors for a brief glimpse before slamming them shut. 2014/08/22
    Last week, the Executive & Planning Committee held a brief public meeting by telephone. After approving the agenda for the next Judicial Council meeting, the committee’s chair, Justice Miller, asked the members to call a different number so that the committee members could privately discuss appointments to the Council’s advisory committees. An article in […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • You no longer have a right to remain silent without being guilty….. 2014/08/16
    Please do not read this article without acknowledging our first amendment right under the U.S. Constitution. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • According to the Judicial Council perjury is OK when they’re conducting it 2014/08/14
    It’s just one of those double standards we apparently must live with, though I would think it entirely fair that a federal grand jury look into the obvious evidence that judicial council staff and their attorneys committed perjury in depositions and filings with the federal courts. After all, a federal grand jury would have jurisdiction […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Are the AOC and JC really the same? 2014/07/29
      On July 29, the Judicial Council will vote to “retire” the name of the Administrative Office of the Court and henceforth refer to the AOC as “the Judicial Council staff.”  The reasons for the change, and for the haste with which it’s being made, remain muddled.  Our branch leaders claim that the change is […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Does the rules committee follow the rules? 2014/07/23
      Last Thursday, the Judicial Council’s Rules and Projects Committee (RUPRO) met to take up the issue of the renaming of the Administrative Office of the Courts, as requested by the Chief Justice.  The RUPRO meeting, conducted telephonically, was slated to run an hour.  It lasted only 15 minutes. As expected, the committee voted unanimously […]
    Judicial Council Watcher

RSS Drudge Report Feed

.
%d bloggers like this: