you're reading...
Association of Discipline Defense Counsel, David Cameron Carr, Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack, Howard Miller, Howard Rice, Jerome Falk, Ninth Circuit, Paul Triana, State Bar Court, Uncategorized

David Cameron Carr: “It is Good to Be King”

Mr. David Cameron Carr — an expert in the area of legal ethics and the
current President of the California-based Association of Discipline
Defense Counsel — has publicly criticized the State Bar of California, Howard Rice’s Jerome Falk, as well as Thomas Girardi and Howard Miller,
over the handling of disciplinary proceedings concerning misconduct by
Thomas Girardi and Walter Lack in the litigation against Dole Food
Company.

David Cameron Carr
Mr David Cameron Carr, believes that “all lawyers must understand the
rules of legal ethics, not only to fulfill their responsibilities to
society and to the justice system, but to protect themselves.”
(Photo credit: www.123people.com )

In a shocking move, Mr. Carr -– a former California State Bar prosecutor
–- offered a stinging rebuke to Jerome Falk’s decision not to pursue any
discipline against Girardi and Lack despite the clear findings of
misconduct on their part by the Ninth Circuit.

Previously, in a rare action, the Ninth Circuit suspended Walter Lack
and Paul Triana of Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack for 6 months, and
reprimanded Thomas Girardi of Girardi & Keese, while imposing close
to $400,000 in monetary sanctions. Specifically, the Ninth Circuit found that the misconduct by Walter Lack
and Thomas Girardi involved “the persistent use of known falsehoods,”
and that the “false representations” were made “knowingly,
intentionally, and recklessly.”
Carr, writing on his blog http://www.ethics-lawyer.com/kafkaesq/ in an
entry labeled “It is Good to Be King,” wrote as follows on January 21,
2011:

“It’s hard to escape the troubling thought that, had Mr. Girardi
and Mr. Lack been different lawyers with no connection to the State Bar
like Howard Miller, the process and perhaps even the result would have
been much different.”

Mr. Carr offered legal analysis, referring to “Bus. & Prof. Code
section 6068(d) (codifying lawyer’s duty not ‘to seek to mislead the
judge or any judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact
or law.’). As a matter of law, this, most assuredly, would warrant the
imposition of discipline in California.” Mr. Carr continued, noting
that “the lack of intent to mislead the court doesn’t seem to matter for
culpability purposes in State Bar Court.”

In his conclusion, Carr stated: “As a discipline defender, I am not inclined to second guess a
decision not to prosecute a discipline case. And I don’t know all the
facts that went into Mr. Falk’s exercise of discretion; he isn’t talking
and neither is the State Bar. But I do know, now as ever, it is good to
be king. Or at least very close to one. Very very good.”

According to confidental sources , Mr. Carr should be commended for his
courage in speaking up, as well as his intellectual honesty and
integrity – the defining traits of a good lawyer. One confidential source believe, however, that some of Mr. Carr’s
comments regarding “intent” are superfluous as Walter Lack had
stipulated that his misconduct was “intentional.” See http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202434690835

About Leslie Brodie

Leslie Brodie is a reporter, writer, blogger, activist, and a religious leader in the community.

Discussion

Comments are closed.

Categories

RSS .

  • Curtis Child Attempts To Cash In On His Tenure at the AOC 2015/07/21
    Date: July 13, 2015 To: (All Judges in the State of California) Subject: Curt Child Joins CourtCall Re: My New Position with CourtCall Hello All: I wanted to let you know that, effective July 1, 2015 I have started my new position as the Director of Court and Government Affairs for CourtCall. This is a […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Help us generate 500+ requests for a JLAC Audit of the Construction & Facilities Maintenance Programs at the Judicial Council. 2015/07/10
    Neither corruption nor sheer incompetence have any place in California’s judicial branch. That’s why we are reaching out to the thousands of readers of JCW to get each and every one of you to write a snail mail letter to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee and point out that nowhere else in America does any […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Time for a Facilities Maintenance & Construction Audit is Overdue 2015/07/08
    If you’ve been following the bouncing ball regarding recent revelations concerning the court construction & facilities maintenance programs from post to post AND if you are a long time reader of both AOC Watcher and Judicial Council Watcher there should be no doubt whatsoever in your mind that there are very serious problems in both […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Questions Regarding Long Beach for the Judicial Council 2015/07/06
    There’s been a bit of a change of heart. Initially, we were going to post the whole story which we’re still working on. Then we thought about giving the judicial council the opportunity to respond…. but over the weekend we figured that it was beneficial that you dear readers should know the questions that we […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Judicial Council’s “Urgent” Traffic Rule Is Too Little, Too Late 2015/07/02
    Recently, the Judicial Council conducted an “urgent open meeting” to approve a rule change allowing drivers to fight their traffic tickets without having to post bail first. The Chief Justice described the meeting as “historic” and characterized the Council’s action as ”an important first step to address an urgent access-to-justice issue.” The Council’s acti […]
    Judicial Council Watcher

RSS Drudge Report Feed

.
%d bloggers like this: