In the aftermath of a report from the Strategic Evaluation Committee which blasted the Administrative Office of the Courts for hiding its finances and number of employees, as well as exercising a “culture of control” over the state’s trial courts, some people in California’s judicial circles are skeptical about a recent survey sent out by Presiding Judge David Rosenberg of Yolo County.
According to Courthouse News Service: “The manner in which he (Judge Rosenberg) was interpreting the results were seen as an attempt to dilute the hard-hitting conclusions of the SEC report and protect the administrative office from the sweeping changes recommended in the report.”
Judge Daniel Goldstein of San Diego commented with some disbelief on the judges who voted for supporting reform “in principle” but voted against reform at “all deliberate speed.”
“Who voted against implementing remedies against waste, mismanagement and abuse of taxpayer dollars? That’s what’s striking,” he said. “That a presiding judge would vote against saving their budget and stopping waste, mismanagement and abuse of taxpayer dollars, that’s amazing.”
He called Rosenberg’s methodology for counting the vote “erroneous.”
Please see complete story @: http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/19/47609.htm
Commentators on Judicial Council Watcher were similarly taken aback by Rosenberg’s antics. The OBT wrote: Judge Rosenberg aka Judge Rosenblab , who our CJ appointed to the JC is out only for himself. His misuse of his position as Chair of the Presiding Judges group is “transparent” . Thanks to Presiding Judges Earl,Ellsworth and Judge Goldstein for seeking to do what is right and calling him on his blatant attempts at obfuscation. Said obfuscation only allows the JC to delay the reforms the SEC report makes clear are necessary.The bottom line is we need to implement the SEC report recommendations and move on to see that the branch works for the benefit of the public we serve.We need to pass 1208 and democratize the JC to avoid the mess we are now mired in.