you're reading...
California Bar Foundation, California Public Utilities Commission, CPUC, Edison International, Geoffrey Brown, Jeffrey Bleich, Keker & Van Nest, Michael Peevey, Munger Tolles & Olson, Peter Arth, Sempra Energy, Southern California Edison

2004 — CPUC Record of SCE Request Re SONGS (TLR Note: 1- Concluded in 2008 2-Notice Geoffrey Brown Assigned Commish 3- In 2007, Brown, SCE’s lawyers – MTO’s Bleich, Phillips – Part of Cal Bar Foundation – CaliforniaALL Scheme Involving Peevey’s Arth)

GFB/JPO/sid 6/24/2004


Application of Southern California Edison Company (U-338-E) for Authorization: (1) to Replace San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit Nos. 2 & 3 (SONGS 2 & 3) Steam Generators; (2) Establish Ratemaking for Cost Recovery; and (3) Address Other Related Steam Generator Replacement Issues.

Application 04-02-026

(Filed February 27, 2004)


Based on prehearing conferences held in this proceeding, and pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 1701.1(b), a scoping memo shall be issued in this proceeding.

Therefore, IT IS RULED that:

1. This application involves the request of Southern California Edison Company (SCE) to replace the steam generators for Units 2 and 3 at its San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

2. The Assigned Commissioner is Geoffrey F. Brown.

3. The assigned Administrative Law Judge, Jeffrey P. O’Donnell, is the principal hearing officer.

4. The category is ratesetting.

5. Hearings are needed.

6. The Issues are:

· The need for the replacement,

· The costs and benefits of the replacement, including the costs and/or benefits of delaying or not performing the replacement, and

· Ratemaking issues.

7. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be prepared. The proceeding will not be submitted, and a final decision will not be issued until after the Final EIR is released to the public.

8. The Schedule is:

· Parties’ testimony December 6, 2004

· SCE’s rebuttal testimony January 10, 2005

· Hearings January 31-February 11, 2005

· Opening briefs March 16, 2005

· Reply briefs April 5, 2005

· Final EIR released to public April 12, 2005

· Projected submission date April 12, 2005

· Presiding Officer’s decision July 11, 2005

· Final Commission Decision September 9, 2005

9. The schedule is subject to change but, pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 1701.5, the proceeding will be resolved within 18 months of the date of this ruling.

10. The evidentiary hearings will be held at the Commission Courtroom, 505 Van Ness Avenue, State Office Building, San Francisco, California. Hearings will begin at 10:00 a.m., on January 31 and February 7, 2005, and at 9:30 a.m. on the other days.

11. Requests for final oral argument pursuant to § 1701.3(d) shall be made orally during the last day of hearings.

12. The ex parte rules specified in Rule 7 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure apply to this proceeding.

Dated June 24, 2004, at San Francisco, California.




Geoffrey F. Brown

Assigned Commissioner


I certify that I have by mail this day served a true copy of the original attached Assigned Commissioner’s Ruling and Scoping Memo on all parties of record in this proceeding or their attorneys of record.

Dated June 24, 2004, at San Francisco, California.


Fannie Sid


Parties should notify the Process Office, Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 2000, San Francisco, CA 94102, of any change of address to insure that they continue to receive documents. You must indicate the proceeding number on the service list on which your name appears.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Commission’s policy is to schedule hearings (meetings, workshops, etc.) in locations that are accessible to people with disabilities. To verify that a particular location is accessible, call: Calendar Clerk (415) 703-1203.

If specialized accommodations for the disabled are needed, e.g., sign language interpreters, those making the arrangements must call the Public Advisor at (415) 703-2074 or TTY# 1-866-836-7825 or (415) 703-5282 at least three working days in advance of the event.


Related stories, please see @:


AND @;…

Top Of Page

About Leslie Brodie

Leslie Brodie is a reporter, writer, blogger, activist, and a religious leader in the community.


Comments are closed.



  • Working for the Judicial Council and a pattern of racketeering activity 2016/10/31
    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Is the CJA suddenly an unauthorized collective bargaining unit? 2016/10/27
    (JCW is responsible for retitling this press release)(JCW also feels that this is a great reason to surrender your CJA membership and join the ACJ and no, we’re not judges or affiliated with the ACJ in any manner) October 25, 2016 Last May, the California Judges Association crowed that it had been given “a seat […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • What it’s like to work for the AOC 2016/10/18
    This Post will be modified  deleted and replaced to reflect individual experiences from people who have worked for the state agency currently known as the Judicial Council Staff or their predecessor, the AOC. While we currently have a few testimonials , we wanted to give you the opportunity to weigh in anonymously via our private […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • The Obligatory Election Post 2016/10/08
    It suffices to state that we were disappointed when the democratic electorate chose not to make Bernie Sanders their candidate. Many of the issues touched on by Sanders are the same issues that ensure the people of Europe economic security. Many countries in Europe offer a free college education. It’s the sole reason that Europe […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Jacobs rushes new law into court, JC (finally) deflates their balloon 2016/10/03
    There goes our promised ten years of funding! On September 9th, the Jacobs cadre of companies rushed their custom crafted legislation into court arguing that they should not be held accountable for being unlicensed and should not be required to pay the people of the State of California back. For twenty one days it appeared […]
    Judicial Council Watcher

RSS Drudge Report Feed

%d bloggers like this: