you're reading...
Bill Clinton, Darrell Steinberg, David Washburn – Voice of OC Managing Editor, Dennis Mangers, James Brosnahan, Joe Dunn, Martha Escutia, Norberto Santana Jr., Superior Court of Orange County, Voice of OC

Voice of OC Refuses to Aid Public Defender… Asks Judge to Quash… Judge Nixes… Norberto Santana: journalists must defend their rights to protect confidential sources (TLR Note: Santana’s reaction – childish; photographer not confidential)

An Orange County Superior Court judge Friday quashed a subpoena issued by the county public defender’s office for unpublished photographs taken by Voice of OC journalists during the riot that broke out in Anaheim on July 24 after protesters were barred from a City Council meeting.

Voice of OC covered the riot and its aftermath extensively, publishing several articles that were accompanied by photographs.

Senior Deputy Public Defender Frank Bittar had sought access to all of the nonprofit news organization’s unpublished photographs from the riot scene as part of his defense of Luis Rodriguez, who was arrested that night and charged with assaulting a police officer.

In a quick decision, Judge James Rogan denied Bittar’s subpoena under the California Shield Law, which protects journalists seeking to maintain the confidentiality of unnamed sources and unpublished information obtained during news gathering.

Rogan, a former congressman who was one of several House mangers during President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial in 1998, directly quoted from the 1974 California Senate judiciary analysis of the shield law:

“The possibility that a reporter’s work product will be subject to subpoena will curtail courageous investigative reporting since the reporters and their newspaper (or other communications media…) will constantly be exposed to the expense and loss of time incurred when required to appear as a witness…This will result in a chilling of the constitutional right of a free press.”

Bittar argued to Rogan that because Voice of OC reporters and photographers were in the midst of the riot scene taking photographs, he believed there was a good chance they held valuable information that could affect his client’s trial.

“I just want to know if there’s exculpatory evidence,” Bittar argued, stressing that his client’s right to a fair trial outweighed journalistic privacy protections in the state constitution.

While Rogan noted “this court has to be mindful of the balancing act,” he ultimately agreed with Voice of OC that Bittar couldn’t show specifically how the news organization’s photos could free his client.

Voice of OC Editor-in-Chief Norberto Santana Jr. applauded Rogan’s decision.

“Judge Rogan stood up for the free press today, and we salute his understanding of California’s Shield Law. Investigative journalists must steadfastly defend their rights to protect confidential sources and unpublished information, and we remain committed to aggressively stand up and defend those rights whenever challenged,” Santana said.

Voice of OC special counsel Kelly Aviles underlined that Rogan’s ruling upheld the vital importance of a free press. “The judge had an excellent understanding of the shield law and correctly applied it given the circumstances of this case,” Aviles said.

Terry Francke, CalAware general counsel and an open records consultant for Voice of OC, said the state’s Supreme Court has consistently ruled that there’s a very high threshold for criminal defendants seeking to use journalist’s notebooks or sources during their trials.


Please continue @:…


See also @:…


About Leslie Brodie

Leslie Brodie is a reporter, writer, blogger, activist, and a religious leader in the community.


Comments are closed.



  • Yet Another Unlicensed Contractor Debacle 2017/07/10
    This story is late in publishing because the AOC (ahem, the judicial council) spent months drawing out our requests for information on a simple inquiry they should have been able to deliver on the same day it was received because what scant information they did provide was readily available to them. But they dragged out […]
  • Another Clifford Ham boondoggle in San Diego 2017/04/19
    More false promises of tunnels reaching out from jails to courthouses. Don’t say we didn’t tell you so because we’ve stated many times that ALL tunnel promises are false promises made to win local support of the projects and penciled out upon approval. What we find most disturbing is that Clifford Ham has a track […]
  • Writing our obit is a bit premature… 2017/04/06
    Welcome to 2017! Yeah, we know, a bit of time has passed since we’ve been hyperactive here. We’ve been a bit busy frying other fish.  If you consider yourself a progressive, you’ve already read and possibly even recognized our work elsewhere. We will be continuing those projects and check in here as not to neglect […]
  • Welcome to the first business day of our reinvigorated 10 year run! 2017/01/02
    Thanks to the sheer incompetence of Judicial Council staff leadership, we’re going to be spending the next ten years nipping at their heels. Last week, the San Francisco trial court ruled that the Jacobs entities maintained their contractors license and that the 22.7 million that the Judicial Council should have been able to recover is […]
  • Working for the Judicial Council and a pattern of racketeering activity 2016/10/31
    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows […]

RSS Unknown Feed

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
%d bloggers like this: