archives

Fogel v. Farmers Group

This category contains 56 posts

Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department Lee Baca and Thomas Girardi — Published 09/01/2011 | Beverly Hills Courier

Sources: Inquiry Launched into Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William Highberger’s Impartiality in Matter of Fogel v Farmers Group

An inquiry has been launched into the impartiality of the judge presiding over the matter of Fogel v. Farmers, The Leslie Brodie Report has learned.

This inquiry was launched following a review of Consumer Dogwatch legal team’s motion to disqualify Judge William Highberger (See http://goo.gl/FGSNB ) , as well as unsubstantiated allegations concerning Judge Highberger, Carolyn Kuhl-Highberger, and Thomas Girardi of Girardi & Keese.

According to sources familiar with the situation, the inquiry will examine the possibility of tacit involvement by Judge Highberger in the circumstances surrounding concurrent representation by the law offices of Girardi & Keese and Skadden Arps.

Specifically, despite their respective roles as counsel for plaintiffs and defendants in Fogel v. Farmers, Girardi & Keese and Skadden Arps entered into a separate agreement by which Skadden Arps and partner Thomas Nolan represented Girardi & Keese and Thomas Girardi before the Ninth Circuit in the matter of In re Girardi following the Ninth Circuit’s issuance of an order to show cause why Girardi & Keese, Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack, Thomas Girardi, and Walter Lack should not be suspended, disbarred, or otherwise sanctioned as a result of the massive fraud which took place in litigation pursued by them against Dole Food Company.

While both cases were pending, and over a period of 4-5 years, neither the Ninth Circuit nor the Los Angeles County Superior Court (nor, for that matter, the class of plaintiffs which Girardi allegedly represents) were ever informed of the concurrent representation.  See http://tinyurl.com/fogelvfarmersobjection

Update 1 – Fogel v Farmers Group, Inc. — Class-Action Settlement

The Leslie Brodie Report (TLR) is carefully following  developments relating to the case of Benjamin Fogel vs. Farmers Group, Inc. currently pending before the Los Angeles Superior Court.  We will provide coverage and post updates as they become available.

– Opposition to Objection by State of Montana Submitted to the Court on August 24, 2011.

– Said opposition presently not part of court documents posted on official settlement website.

– Plans underway for formal motion to intervene and vacate any judgment which doesn’t address, in a meaningful way, issues relating to the concurrent representation.

– List of objectors grows, and now also include: BRILLIANT MARVIN, CASEY MICHAEL, CHOI HYUNG, COLEMAN BOBBIE JOE SR., COPE STEVEN,CORSER JOSEPH, CORSER NANCY, EHMKE JOSHUA,
ELLIOTT JANICE,HEARD MATTIE, JOHNSON MARK, KEMPER ANNE, LEVERETS LUCY, LYONS GEORGE,RUDOLPH LORENA, REYES ESTELLA,RICHARDS ALEX,RUDOLPH JAMES,SCHUH CHARMAIN,VALLEE JAMES ,VARELA MELODY,

LAKE DAVID N. LAW OFFICES OF APC – Attorney for Objector
LAW OFFICES OF EVAN A. NIELSEN – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
LAW OFFICES OF R. KEITH PERKINS – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
LOCKE LORD BISSELL & LIDDELL LLP – Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
LONGLEY & MAXWELL LLP – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
MILLER STEVE A. – Attorney for Objector
OFFERMAN & KING LLP – Objector
PALMER DARRELL LAW OFFICES OF – Attorney for Objector
SHERWOOD ALAN J. – Attorney for Objector
WINN KATHERINE LAW OFFICES OF – Attorney for Objector

08/24/2011 Opposition Document (to mtn-intervene filed by State of Montana and certain Montana class members )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

08/24/2011 Opposition Document (and joinder to Defts’ oppo to mtn to intervene by State of Montana and individual consumers )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Future Hearings
09/02/2011 at 11:00 am in department 307 at 600 South Commonwealth Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90005
Status Conference (FINAL APPROVAL READINESSCONFERENCE)

09/07/2011 at 09:00 am in department 307 at 600 South Commonwealth Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90005
APPROVAL – SETTLEMENT (1) HEARING RE FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT2) MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES3) MTN-INTERVENE4) PRO HAC VICE)

PointOfLaw Forum: Fogel v. Farmers Group: CCAF challenges $90m fee in claims-made settlement

FORUM

« Around the web, August 22 |

August 23, 2011

Fogel v. Farmers Group: CCAF challenges $90m fee in claims-made settlement

The Fogel v. Farmers Group settlement seems impressive from the notice: $455 million! When you get to the fine print, it turns out that class members have to jump through hoops to claim amounts as small as under a dollar, and that anything not claimed will revert to Farmers affiliates. Even if the settlement was worth $455 million, the $90 million fee request is excessive. The Center for Class Action Fairness LLC has objected on behalf of two class members. More: LA Times; Consumer Watchdog.

Interestingly, class counsel is Thomas Girardi, who POL reported on here; the defense attorneys are Skadden, which represented Girardi in In re Girardi.

Posted by Ted Frank at 9:38 AM
Tags: , , , , ,

Ethics Complaint filed with California State Bar against Skadden Arps’ Thomas Nolan/Raoul Kennedy and Girardi Keese’s Thomas Girardi/Graham LippSmith for Alleged Misconduct in Fogel v. Farmers Group Inc.

<img style=”margin: 0px;” title=”null” src=”http://mooker.com/backend/uploads/1/police-siren-animated.gif&#8221; alt=”null” width=”500″ height=”70″ />

TLR has learned an ethics complaint alleging multiple acts of misconduct has been filed with the State Bar of California against attorneys from the firms of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Girardi & Keese.

Knowledgeable sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, maintain the complaint alleges that ethical breaches took place as a result of Skadden Arps’ representation of Girardi & Keese in the matter of In Re Girardi because, at the same time, Girardi & Keese and Skadden Arps were on opposing sides in the case of Fogel v. Farmers Group, Inc.

According to the sources, the parties named in the complaint are Raoul Kennedy, Thomas Nolan, and Richard Zurmoski of Skadden Arps as well as Graham LippSmith and Thomas Girardi of Girardi & Keese.

<img style=”margin: 0px;” src=”http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ_h8ZvcHSm4_GhiYpKwD3XbnjNcVMhNJ0PWYekBXcRombYWwZN8xL-Hg&#8221; alt=”” width=”100″ height=”150″ />Thomas Girardi of Girardi & Keese
From left, Messrs. Raoul Kennedy, Thomas Nolan, Thomas Girardi and Graham LippSmith.

The complaint alleges that in August 2003, Walter Lack (of Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack) and Thomas Girardi and Graham LippSmith (of Girardi & Keese) filed a class action suit on behalf of plaintiffs Benjamin Fogel against Farmers Group, Inc. in Los Angeles County Superior Court.  The suit — which is still pending and is anticipated to settle in September 2011 — was defended by attorneys from Skadden Arps (Raoul Kennedy and Richard Zurmoski).

Despite their respective roles as plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants’ counsel in Fogel v. Farmers, Girardi & Keese and Skadden Arps entered into an agreement by which Skadden Arps and partner Thomas Nolan would represent Girardi & Keese and Thomas Girardi before the Ninth Circuit in the matter of In re Girardi following the Ninth Circuit’s issuance of an order to show cause why Girardi & Keese, Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack, Thomas Girardi, and Walter Lack should not be suspended, disbarred, or otherwise sanctioned as a result of the massive fraud which took place in litigation pursued by them against Dole Food Company.

On July 13, 2010, the Ninth Circuit issued an order suspending Walter Lack for a period of six months and reprimanding Girardi; the order also imposed almost $500,000 in monetary sanctions against the two attorneys.

<img src=”http://data6.blog.de/media/892/5317892_704b3a97c0_m.jpeg” height=”352″ width=”500″ alt=”In Re Girardi ” />

<img src=”http://data6.blog.de/media/857/5479857_75bd167d2c_m.jpeg” height=”64″ width=”500″ alt=”Skadden Arps Thomas Nolan” />

On July 14 2010, in an attempt to conceal their attorney-client relationship, Skadden Arps and Thomas Nolan filed a motion with the Ninth Circuit asking for their names to be redacted from the published opinion.

According to sources, including TLR’s legal correspondent — known as State Bar Insider (“SBI”) — the arrangement described above is disfavored and unethical; moreover, for such a reltionship to be authorized, Thomas Girardi was required to notify each member of the class he represents about his status as a client of Skadden Arps, and seek a waiver and obtain approval from his clients.

According to SBI, “on its face and based of my reading of “Freivogel on Conflicts,” it appears that Tom Girardi violated his duty of loyalty and zealousness as well as the duty of candor to his clients — the class that he allegedly represents.”

Moreover, according to sources, Skadden Arps has also violated multiple ethical rules and statutes by agreeing to undertake the representation of Girardi & Keese and Thomas Girardi.

A separate source stated: “Assume for the sake of argument that Skadden Arps feels a motion for sanction is warranted against Mr. Girardi in Fogel v. Farmers.  Taking such action would require Skadden to be directly adverse to its client (Thomas Girardi) in the matter of In Re Girardi.”

Moreover, according to SBI, he never heard of a practice by which counsel is asking a court to redact her or his name from a published opinion. “They obviously were attempting to conceal the relationship, and now I am fairly certain as to why it was done,” SBI concluded.

Knowledgeable sources maintain that the ethics complaint seeks the removal of Thomas Girardi’s name from the roll of members of the State Bar of California, and asks that multiple years of actual suspension be imposed on Graham LippSmith, Raoul Kennedy, Thomas Nolan, and Richard Zurmoski.

Ethics Complaint filed with California State Bar against Skadden Arps’ Thomas Nolan/Raoul Kennedy and Girardi Keese’s Thomas Girardi/Graham LippSmith for Alleged Misconduct in Fogel v. Farmers Group Inc.

TLR has learned an ethics complaint alleging multiple acts of misconduct has been filed with the State Bar of California against attorneys from the firms of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP and Girardi &amp; Keese.

Knowledgeable sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, maintain the complaint alleges that ethical breaches took place as a result of Skadden Arps’ representation of Girardi &amp; Keese in the matter of In Re Girardi because, at the same time, Girardi &amp; Keese and Skadden Arps were on opposing sides in the case of Fogel v. Farmers Group, Inc.

According to the sources, the parties named in the complaint are Raoul Kennedy, Thomas Nolan, and Richard Zurmoski of Skadden Arps as well as Graham LippSmith and Thomas Girardi of Girardi &amp; Keese.

The complaint alleges that in August 2003, Walter Lack (of Engstrom, Lipscomb &amp; Lack) and Thomas Girardi and Graham LippSmith (of Girardi &amp; Keese) filed a class action suit on behalf of plaintiffs Benjamin Fogel against Farmers Group, Inc. in Los Angeles County Superior Court.  The suit — which is still pending and is anticipated to settle in September 2011 — was defended by attorneys from Skadden Arps (Raoul Kennedy and Richard Zurmoski).  
 
Despite their respective roles as plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants’ counsel in Fogel v. Farmers, Girardi &amp; Keese and Skadden Arps entered into an agreement by which Skadden Arps and partner Thomas Nolan would represent Girardi &amp; Keese and Thomas Girardi before the Ninth Circuit in the matter of In re Girardi following the Ninth Circuit’s issuance of an order to show cause why Girardi &amp; Keese, Engstrom Lipscomb &amp; Lack, Thomas Girardi, and Walter Lack should not be suspended, disbarred, or otherwise sanctioned as a result of the massive fraud which took place in litigation pursued by them against Dole Food Company. 

On July 13, 2010, the Ninth Circuit issued an order suspending Walter Lack for a period of six months and reprimanding Girardi; the order also imposed almost $500,000 in monetary sanctions against the two attorneys.

In Re Girardi

Skadden Arps Thomas Nolan

On July 14 2010, in an attempt to conceal their attorney-client relationship, Skadden Arps and Thomas Nolan filed a motion with the Ninth Circuit asking for their names to be redacted from the published opinion.

According to sources, including TLR’s legal correspondent — known as State Bar Insider (“SBI”) — the arrangement described above is disfavored and unethical; moreover, for such a reltionship to be authorized, Thomas Girardi was required to notify each member of the class he represents about his status as a client of Skadden Arps, and seek a waiver and obtain approval from his clients.

According to SBI, “on its face and based of my reading of “Freivogel on Conflicts,” it appears that Tom Girardi violated his duty of loyalty and zealousness as well as the duty of candor to his clients — the class that he allegedly represents.” 

Moreover, according to sources, Skadden Arps has also violated multiple ethical rules and statutes by agreeing to undertake the representation of Girardi &amp; Keese and Thomas Girardi.

A separate source stated: “Assume for the sake of argument that Skadden Arps feels a motion for sanction is warranted against Mr. Girardi in Fogel v. Farmers.  Taking such action would require Skadden to be directly adverse to its client (Thomas Girardi) in the matter of In Re Girardi.”

Moreover, according to SBI, he never heard of a practice by which counsel is asking a court to redact her or his name from a published opinion. “They obviously were attempting to conceal the relationship, and now I am fairly certain as to why it was done,” SBI concluded.

Knowledgeable sources maintain that the ethics complaint seeks the removal of Thomas Girardi’s name from the roll of members of the State Bar of California, and asks that multiple years of actual suspension be imposed on Graham LippSmith, Raoul Kennedy, Thomas Nolan, and Richard Zurmoski.

Categories

RSS .

  • The 4.7 Million Dollar Plumas-Sierra Regional Storage Shed 2015/03/04
    Recently, we told you about the closure of the Plumas/Sierra Regional Courthouse, the first courthouse construction project managed from start to finish by the AOC. It was built at a cost of $4.7 million, it was open only four days a month at its peak, and it shut its doors just four years after it […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Beyond Accountability – A call for legislative and executive branch intervention 2015/03/02
    The latest state auditors report is just another report in a long string of reports going back for over five years that have repeatedly painted the judicial council into a corner. As each report was released a very highly paid army of insiders went on the offensive in a concerted effort to discount the conclusions […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Judicial Council takes little action in response to audit 2015/02/25
    Last week, the Judicial Council met for the second time since State Auditor Elaine Howle released her searing critique of the way in which the AOC/Judicial Council staff runs its entire operation. As you’ll recall, the State Auditor concluded that the AOC has channeled money away from the trial courts to pay for services that […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • Another pfabulous meeting? 2015/02/24
    It is being alleged that on March 9 2015, Gerald Pfab is hosting another all day meeting in Sacramento’s AOC Offices with all of the facilities management unit staff from around the State required to attend in person to discuss reductions in the facilities management unit vehicle fleet. (a little more than half of the […]
    Judicial Council Watcher
  • How’s that open meeting rule working for you? 2015/02/17
    Back in 2013, in an effort to fix the lack of transparency that led to the CCMS fiasco, the Legislative Analyst’s Office directed the Judicial Council to “submit to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee a report on the implementation of an open meetings rule” for its advisory bodies. So the Council came up with a […]
    Judicial Council Watcher

RSS Drudge Report Feed

  • White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details... 2015/03/04
    White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...(Top headline, 1st story, link)Related stories:VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...Thunderous Applause...'Days when Jewish people remain passive in […]
  • VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH... 2015/03/04
    VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...(Top headline, 2nd story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...Thunderous Applause...'Days when Jewish people remain passive in […]
  • Assails nuke talks... 2015/03/04
    Assails nuke talks...(Top headline, 3rd story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...Thunderous Applause...'Days when Jewish people remain passive in […]
  • 'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'... 2015/03/04
    'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...(Top headline, 4th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...Thunderous Applause...'Days when Jewish people remain passive in […]
  • 'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'... 2015/03/04
    'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...(Top headline, 5th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...Thunderous Applause...'Days when Jewish people remain passive in […]
  • Thunderous Applause... 2015/03/04
    Thunderous Applause...(Top headline, 6th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...'Days when Jewish people remain passive in […]
  • 'Days when Jewish people remain passive in face of genocidal aggression are over'... 2015/03/04
    'Days when Jewish people remain passive in face of genocidal aggression are over'...(Top headline, 7th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the […]
  • Broadcast Networks Refuse to Carry... 2015/03/04
    Broadcast Networks Refuse to Carry...(Top headline, 8th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...Thunderous Applause...'Days […]
  • 'Enraged' Pelosi freaks on floor... 2015/03/04
    'Enraged' Pelosi freaks on floor...(Top headline, 9th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...Thunderous Applause... […]
  • 'Near Tears Throughout'... 'Saddened by the insult'... 2015/03/04
    'Near Tears Throughout'... 'Saddened by the insult'...(Top headline, 10th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad […]
  • Dems LASH OUT at Netanyahu, Tell Him to Go Home, Call Him 'a Child'... 2015/03/04
    Dems LASH OUT at Netanyahu, Tell Him to Go Home, Call Him 'a Child'...(Top headline, 11th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of ji […]
  • Obama says read transcript; 'nothing new'... 2015/03/04
    Obama says read transcript; 'nothing new'...(Top headline, 12th story, link)Related stories:White House warns Netanyahu not to reveal Iran details...VIDEO: BIBI SPEECH...Assails nuke talks...'It Paves Iran's Path To The Bomb'...'Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad'...Thunderous App […]
  • TARGET TO LAY OFF THOUSANDS 2015/03/04
    TARGET TO LAY OFF THOUSANDS(Main headline, 1st story, link)
  • Shots Fired Near NSA Headquarters, Building Damaged by Gunfire... 2015/03/04
    Shots Fired Near NSA Headquarters, Building Damaged by Gunfire...(First column, 1st story, link)
  • BOEHNER SUBMITS TO OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY... 2015/03/04
    BOEHNER SUBMITS TO OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY...(First column, 2nd story, link)Related stories:Punts to courts...Congress passes 'Homeland' bill without conditions...SCHLAFLY: Audacious scheme to win elections with illegals...Gov't Immigration Union: Obama Inviting An Attack Worse Than 9/11...
  • Punts to courts... 2015/03/04
    Punts to courts...(First column, 3rd story, link)Related stories:BOEHNER SUBMITS TO OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY...Congress passes 'Homeland' bill without conditions...SCHLAFLY: Audacious scheme to win elections with illegals...Gov't Immigration Union: Obama Inviting An Attack Worse Than 9/11...
  • Congress passes 'Homeland' bill without conditions... 2015/03/04
    Congress passes 'Homeland' bill without conditions...(First column, 4th story, link)Related stories:BOEHNER SUBMITS TO OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY...Punts to courts...SCHLAFLY: Audacious scheme to win elections with illegals...Gov't Immigration Union: Obama Inviting An Attack Worse Than 9/11...
  • SCHLAFLY: Audacious scheme to win elections with illegals... 2015/03/04
    SCHLAFLY: Audacious scheme to win elections with illegals...(First column, 5th story, link)Related stories:BOEHNER SUBMITS TO OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY...Punts to courts...Congress passes 'Homeland' bill without conditions...Gov't Immigration Union: Obama Inviting An Attack Worse Than 9/11...
  • Gov't Immigration Union: Obama Inviting An Attack Worse Than 9/11... 2015/03/04
    Gov't Immigration Union: Obama Inviting An Attack Worse Than 9/11...(First column, 6th story, link)Related stories:BOEHNER SUBMITS TO OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY...Punts to courts...Congress passes 'Homeland' bill without conditions...SCHLAFLY: Audacious scheme to win elections with illegals...
  • NEXT EXECUTIVE ACTION? OBAMA 'VERY INTERESTED' IN UNILATERAL TAX HIKE... 2015/03/04
    NEXT EXECUTIVE ACTION? OBAMA 'VERY INTERESTED' IN UNILATERAL TAX HIKE...(First column, 7th story, link)Related stories:VIDEO: Supporters Endorse Karl Marx As Next President...
.